Legal Opinion

Fankell v. Schober

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided May 1, 1984No. 83-411PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHLEGEL, Judge.

The plaintiff, Montica Rae Fankell, appeals from the trial court’s refusal to reinstate this tort action which was dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 215.1. Initially, we are faced with the question of whether the defendants are required to cross-appeal the trial court’s finding that the motion to reinstate was timely filed, in order to urge that ground in support of the trial court’s favorable determination refusing to reinstate the action. Then we must determine whether the plaintiff’s motion to reinstate under Iowa Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Citizens First National Bank v. HoytSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Rath v. SholtySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Schimerowski v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. Brown v. Iowa District Court for Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Talbot v. TalbotSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doland v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. Blume v. AuerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1997
  3. Sanchez v. KiltsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  4. Tiffany v. Brenton State Bank of JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1993
  5. Doland v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API