Legal Opinion
In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC for Certificate of Public Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 29, 2016No. 2015-230PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. The Town of Rutland (Town) and five adjoining landowners (neighbors) appeal from the Vermont Public Service Board’s grant of a certificate of public good (CPG) under 30 V.S.A. § 248 to Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC (RRE) for construction of the Cold River Solar Project (Project), a 2.3 megawatt (Mw) solar photovoltaic electric generation facility. The Town and neighbors argue that the Board incorrectly held that the project will not unduly interfere with the orderly development of the region, will not have an undue adverse effect on aesthetics, and will not have an undue adverse impact…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Amended Petition of UPC Vermont Wind, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In Re HalnonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In Re Green Mountain Power Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- In Re MacIntyre Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- In re Goddard College Conditional Use, Goddard College Act 250 ReconsiderationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Petition of Stowe Cady Hill Solar, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLC (Libby Harris and Apple Hill Homeowners Association, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes and Timothy Holmes, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.