Legal Opinion

American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Laser Peripherals, LLC

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 13, 2009No. Civil 08-4798 (JNE/FLN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.

American Medical Systems, Inc., and its subsidiary, Laserscope, (collectively, AMS) assert claims of patent infringement against Laser Peripherals, LLC (LP). LP counterclaims for declarations of non-infringement and invalidity. The case is before the Court to construe disputed claim terms pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996).

I. BACKGROUND

AMS owns U.S. Patent No. 5,428,699 (filed July 2, 1993), entitled “Probe Having Optical Fiber for Laterally Directing Laser Beam.” Russell Pon is the sole…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Laser Peripherals, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  2. American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  3. American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API