United States v. City of Niagara Falls
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, District Judge.
By order dated December 7, 1987, this court granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment finding that the discharge of untreated dry weather flows from the Falls Street Tunnel [FST] into the Niagara River constituted a violation by defendant of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and its 1975 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] permit, and ordered defendant to remedy that violation by abating the flow or re-diverting it through the Niagara Falls Wastewater Treatment Plant [WWTP] unless defendant could sufficiently demonstrate to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carlos Romero-Barcelo, Etc. v. Harold BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Borough of Upper Saddle River v. Rockland County Sewer District 1District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. RiceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- City of New York v. Anglebrook Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995