Legal Opinion
Perkins v. Federal Fruit & Produce Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 14, 2013No. Civil Case No. 11-cv-00542-JAP-KLMPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND TO VACATE TRIAL AND JUDGMENT AND/OR FOR A NEW TRIAL
JAMES A. PARKER, Senior District Judge.
In DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND TO VACATE TRIAL AND JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PERKINS AND MILLER (1) BECAUSE OF IRREGULARITIES; (2) FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; (3) PURSUANT TO THE COURT’S INHERENT POWERS OR RULE 59 Or. 60, AND/OR FOR A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO RULE 59 (Doc. No. 164) (Motion), Defendants Federal Fruit and Produce Company, Inc. (FFP) and Defendant Michael Martelli (Martelli) ask the Court to vacate the Judgment1…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mantooth v. Bavaria Inn Restaurant, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- AECOM Technical Services, Inc. v. Flatiron AECOM, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Agri-Systems v. Structural Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Anderson v. Colorado Mountain News Media, Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Arnold v. Weld County School District RE-5JDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.