Morgan v. West Memphis Steel & Pipe, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
*931 ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
Pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 4). Defendant has responded.1 Plaintiffs have replied.2 For the reasons set out below, the Motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND3
Plaintiffs Scott Morgan and Chris Morgan (brothers) are former employees of Defendant West Memphis Steel & Pipe, Inc. Scott went to work for West Memphis Steel in 2000 and Chris went to work there in 2005. In 2009, each employee signed an “Employment, Non-disclosure, and Non-competition Agreement” with West Memphis Steel. Under the terms of the Agreements, for two…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holloway v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Bendinger v. Marshalltown Trowell Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Counts v. MK-Ferguson Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- HRR Arkansas, Inc. v. River City Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Progressive Technologies Inc. v. Chaffin Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Lamb & Associates Packaging, Inc. v. Troy W. Best; James Best; And Precision Digital Printing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020