Legal Opinion

I & I Holding Corp. v. Gainsburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

Plaintiff moved to strike out the third, fifth and sixth defenses contained in the answer as insufficient in law. The court, however, found the complaint bad for failure to allege *551sufficient consideration and dismissed it without leave to amend. It accordingly held that it was unnecessary to pass upon plaintiff’s motion to strike out the defenses.

The action was brought to recover upon defendant’s written pledge of $5,000 made to Beth Israel Hospital. The charitable subscription signed by defendant reads as follows: “ To aid and assist the Beth Israel Hospital Association in its humanitarian…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Presb. Church of Albany v. . CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Keuka College v. . RayNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tioga County General Hospital v. TiddNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Snyder v. GuiderNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ahava Dairy Products Corp. v. Trident Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. New School for Social Research v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API