Legal Opinion

Tudor v. Chicago & South Side Rapid Transit Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Carter, J.:

This controversy has its origin in certain proceedings prosecuted by the Chicago and South Side Rapid Transit Railroad Company for the purpose of acquiring a right of way for its elevated railroad. The only question presented by the record is in respect to the jurisdiction and authority of the court to condemn, for the purposes of such right of way, the west six feet of a certain lot 13, owned by Ella A. Tudor, the appellant, and described in the petition of said company. Such proceedings were had in the circuit court of Cook county as that §2670 was awarded to appellant as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Metropolitan City Railway Co. v. Chicago West Division Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. DunbarIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Mason v. City of ShawneetownIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Heaton v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chicago Mechanics' InstituteIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Connolly v. Standard Casualty CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Long v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API