Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hazel v. Watkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

We transferred this cause to the Supreme Court on the ground, as we believed, that we had no jurisdiction. [State ex rel. Hazel et al. v. Watkins, 227 S. W. 1059.] The Supreme Court retransferred, holding that jurisdiction is here., [State ex rel. Hazel et al. v. Watkins, 245 S. W. 1059.]

The cause is in mandamus to compel a justice of the peace to grant a change of venue in a criminal case. The alternative writ was granted by the judge of the circuit court in vacation. Respondent below, appellant here, made return. To this return relators demurred. The demurrer was sustained and apellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lloyd v. ClaytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Guy v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Wedeking v. McCrackenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Smith-Kernohan Co. v. DabbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Sedgwick Furniture Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API