Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Ware

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action, for penalty. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. December 27, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial which complains of a ruling under which certain evidence was., admitted, But which fails to disclose what objection, if any, was interposed to its admissibility at *366tlie time it was offered, can not be considered. Smith v. Smith, 133 Ga. 170 (3) (65 S. E. 414).

November 18, 1910. Action, for penalty. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. December 27, 1909. W. H. Gurr and E. T. Hickey, for plaintiff in error.

2. An attack upon a statute as unconstitutional, made for the first time in the brief of counsel in the Supreme Court, will not be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sparks Milling Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Noll v. NolanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Wilkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Franklin Buggy Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API