Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 2013No. 5D12-1074PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerger, J.

Appellant, Adam Haynes, appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his pro se motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Haynes argues that his nine-year sentence, consisting of three consecutive three-year minimum mandatory terms, is illegal on its face. Because we hold the sentence was not subject to challenge by way of a motion to correct illegal sentence, we affirm the trial court’s denial.

Haynes was originally charged by Information with eight counts: five counts of aggravated assault with a firearm in violation of sections…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jolly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Nedd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Dominguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Wheeler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Torbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Shawntavian Tucker v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Richard Warren Vanzile v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. ARMANDO B. HIDALGO v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Alfred Dinkins v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API