Legal Opinion
Wolfson v. Beris
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1980No. 50379PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Justice.
Normand Beris appeals from a judgment and $60,000 damages award entered against him in favor of Blair Wolfson. The trial court ruled that Wolfson was entitled to the judgment and award because Beris breached his warranty of authority to sell real estate. Beris appeals on the grounds that no cause of action for breach of warranty of authority to sell real estate existed, and that, even if the cause of action existed, the damages award is excessive. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand with instructions.
The real estate involved in this case, 526 Nicollet Mall,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tonka Corporation v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Skaaraas v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- McCray v. ButtellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- 4 soc.sec.rep.ser. 216, Medicare&medicaid Gu 33,636 Rochester Methodist Hospital, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation v. The Travelers Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rochester Methodist Hospital, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation v. The Travelers Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Rochester Methodist Hospital, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation v. The Travelers Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, and U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- C.S. McCrossan Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Rochester Methodist Hospital v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984