Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Puckett

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 28, 1981No. 52,507Published

1Concurrence

Rees, J.:

Concurring.

The twenty-one convictions before us are for the sale of an unregistered security (K.S.A. 17-1255), failing to register as a broker-dealer or agent (K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 17-1254[a]), and an unlawful act in connection with the sale of a security (K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 17-1253[a]), arising out of each of seven sales. The K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 17-1253(a) convictions, the “fraud” convictions, are the real subject of this appeal.

When the sales were made, Puckett was obligated to effect an assignment of a carried interest of 25% of the “working interest” and an identical interest was to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lollis v. Superior Sales Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Ziegler v. CrofootSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Bourgeois v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Ashland Oil & Refining Company v. Carlton BealCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. Byrd v. SmythCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API