Legal Opinion

Shafer v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Carson, J.), dated January 6, 1999, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b and 214 to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the current version of CPLR 306-b, which became effective on January 1, 1998 (L 1997, ch 476, § 2), may not be applied retroactively (see, Matter of Ulster Hgts. Prop. v Assessor of Town of Orangetown, 261 AD2d 478; Connor v Deas, 255 AD2d 287). Bracken, J.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Connor v. DeasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Ulster Heights Property, Inc. v. Assessor of OrangetownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API