Legal Opinion

Alberty v. City of Henderson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1990No. 20397PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*300OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants are real property owners in the City of Henderson, Nevada. Respondents (henceforth, City of Henderson) have *301established estimated special assessments to be levied against appellants’ property in order to pay for various municipal improvements, such as paving. Appellants contend that the estimated special assessments were manifestly excessive and, hence, invalid. We hold that, based on this record, appellants have not demonstrated that the estimated assessments were invalid. However, appellants were not allowed to present any evidence in district court to show that the…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Urban Renewal Agency of City of Reno v. IacomettiNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of AlbionNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. City of Reno v. FolsomNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Nolan v. Bureau of Assessors of New York City Finance AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Brown v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Downtown Rutland Special Tax Challengers v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API