Legal Opinion

Burdick v. York Oil Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1963No. 13994PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is a personal injury case. The jury answered all issues against the plaintiff, Hope A. Burdick, and he has appealed. The case must be reversed upon the points which complain that Mr. Tom Alexander, attorney for the defendant York Oil Company, Inc., saturated the record with harmful and excluded evidence.

Plaintiff sued for damages to his neck suffered in a collision when the driver of York Oil Company’s car ran into the rear of plaintiff’s car. There was evidence which would support a verdict either way. The trial lasted two weeks and the statement of facts consists of 1,196…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Brackenridge v. Roberts and McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Condra Funeral Home v. RollinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Brackenridge v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Whittley v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Proper v. MowryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Onstad v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. Redding v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Rodarte v. Cox, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API