Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Massey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 6, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction for rape of a child. He contends that he was unfairly prejudiced by the trial judge’s refusal to allow defense counsel to cross-examine the child-victim at voir dire, after having allowed the prosecutor direct examination, and by the judge’s allowance of cross-examination of the defendant and of his character witness on the issue of the defendant’s use of alcohol. We affirm.

The victim of the alleged crime was the defendant’s son, who was about five years of age at the time of the alleged rape, and just under ten years of age at the time of trial. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DoucetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. DoucetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. NewballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McNelleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  2. State v. BlumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. MolleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. State v. MauleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API