Legal Opinion

Penn Lumber Co. v. Hanover Bending & Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1929No. Appeal 29Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Plaintiff brought this action of replevin for a carload of beech lumber. Defendant gave a counter-bond and retained the lumber. Plaintiff obtained a verdict for its value. The court entered judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the defendant.

The relevant facts were in writing and may be summarized as follows: On January 31st defendant ordered a carload of 2" beech lumber, to grade 75% No. 1 common and better, 25% No. 2 common, to be delivered at Hanover, Pa., @ $70' per thousand feet f. o. b. Hanover, Pa. Plaintiff accepted the order, on February 1st, terms, freight…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frech v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Albus v. ToomeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Bughman v. Central BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Rodman v. ThalheimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  5. Reed v. FelmleeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API