United States v. Schwartz
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
Defendant moves pursuant to Rule 48 (b), F.R.Cr.P., to dismiss the indictment charging complicity in the preparation of a fraudulent income tax return (26 U.S. C. § 7206(2)). Defendant claims that Rule 48(b)1 vests in the trial court the discretion to dismiss for unnecessary delay in bringing a defendant to trial and claims that such unnecessary delay has been demonstrated.
Defendant was indicted on April 1, 1965, and pleaded not guilty on May 10, 1965. The case was adjourned with the consent of defendant’s counsel twelve times between May 10, 1965 and April 20, 1966.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Jack A. LustmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- United States v. DoolingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States of America Ex Rel. Kahmid Solomon, Relator-Appellant v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. MannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.