Legal Opinion

Alabama Agricultural & Mechanical University v. King

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 4, 1993No. 1910124Published

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

This case involves certain provisions of the Pair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (1988), and the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. § 255(a) and § 260 (1988), as they apply to the position of dormitory counselor at Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University (“Alabama A & M”). The trial court entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial. 643 So.2d 1358. We granted certiorari review, and we now reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and remand the cause.

*1365The plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Sheila Ann Glenn, Patricia F. Johns, and Robbie Nugent v. General Motors Corporation, Saginaw Steering Gear DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Tenneco Oil Co. v. Kern Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Brocato v. BrocatoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API