Legal Opinion

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 20, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

Plaintiffs seek instructions as to whether a portion of the corpus of one testamentary trust (“Needy Poor”) can be transferred under the cy pres doctrine to assist in effectuating the testator’s intention with respect to another trust (“Library”).

Plaintiffs are co-trustees under the will of Daniel Hirsch, deceased. They are also named as defendants in their capacities as co-trustees under the testamentary trusts involved in this litigation.1 Because public charities were involved, the Attorney General was made a party defendant. His office took no active part in the case.

Basi…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delaware Trust Co. v. GrahamCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  2. Union Methodist Episcopal Church v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stevens Bros. Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Weller v. Farmers Bank of the StateCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1970
  3. In Re Estate of Du PontCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
  4. First National B. & T. Co. v. First National B. & T. Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  5. UNION METHODIST EPISCOPAL CH. v. Equitable SEC. Tr. Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API