Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Avery

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2013No. 2010AP1952Published

1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 98. {dissenting). The majority reverses the court of appeals not because of any legal or factual error. Rather, the majority in essence disregards the standard of review and reverses the court of appeals simply because it does not agree with the outcome.

¶ 99. The standard of review in this case requires us to determine whether the court of appeals erroneously exercised its discretion because it committed a legal or factual error. In order to appear as if it reviews this matter for an erroneous exercise of discretion, the majority takes the court of appeals to task for failing to analyze…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. DuboseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. Lawson/JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API