Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Glorioso

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 7, 2002No. 2002-B-1074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

LPER CURIAM.

This matter arises from a petition for consent discipline filed by respondent, Vincent J, Glorioso, Jr., an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana *321but currently on interim suspension.1 For his misconduct, respondent proposed a three-year suspension from the practice of law. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) concurred in respondent’s petition, and the disciplinary board recommended the proposed discipline be accepted.

UNDERLYING FACTS

The Henderson Matter

In 1994, respondent was retained to represent Yolanda Henderson in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In re GloriosoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. In re McCannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KellingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KellingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re GloriosoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API