Legal Opinion

Kokernot v. Denman

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 10, 1986No. 13-85-168-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

This is an appeal from a partial summary judgment involving a will construction and decree of partition.

Appellant brings four points of error, considered together for purposes of this appeal. Appellant claims that the trial court erred in granting appellees’ partial summary judgment. The trial court held that the one-half interest in properties known as “First Tract” and “Second Tract” acquired by Ruth Spooner Kokemot, deceased, after execution of her will, passed under “Item Eighth” of her will to her two grandchildren, appellees Bryan S. Denman and David Brent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shriner's Hospital for Crippled Children of Texas v. StahlTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Briggs v. PeeblesTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Welch v. StraachTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Rekdahl v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Haley v. GatewoodTexas Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Newbill, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989
  2. Hudson v. Hopkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API