Legal Opinion

Klein v. Pederson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1902No. 12,041PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court for Lari crater county. Tried below before Frost, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, 0.

This is an action at law to recover the sum of $40 paid by the defendant in error to the plaintiff in error to prevent a criminal prosecution. There was a trial to the court without a jury and finding and judgment for the plaintiff below, from which the defendant has taken error to this court.

The record discloses the following facts: Pederson, the *453defendant in error, is a farmer living some fifteen miles distant from the city of Lincoln. 1-Ie is a Dane and unable to read or write the English language and wholly unacquainted with court proceedings. For three or four years previous to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duval v. . WellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Hess v. CulverMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hinsdill v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
  4. Davidson v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bankers Surety Co. v. Willow Springs Beverage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Griffin v. ChriswisserNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API