Legal Opinion
Bellmon v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 11, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-CV-1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. *66110). For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum, the Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Officers David Richardson and Christopher Rommel are police officers for the City of Philadelphia (the “City”), and Louis Giorla is the Prison Commissioner of the City (collectively, the “Defendants”). The gravamen of the Plaintiffs claims against the Defendants is that Officers Richardson and Rommel deliberately struck him with a police patrol car while the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- O'Donnell v. Tinicum TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- COLEMAN v. GALLAGHERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- MCKENNA v. WOLKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- RAWLINGS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.