Legal Opinion

Smith, Officer of Bob, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1992No. 91-1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The BTA decided, essentially on the basis that Smith was the president and sole officer of Bob, Inc., that he was a responsible officer under the statute and liable for payment of the unpaid sales taxes. We hold that the decision of the BTA was unreasonable and reverse it.

Being an officer of a corporation does not, in and of itself, impose liability on an individual. Weiss v. Porterfield (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 117, 56 O.O.2d 65, 271 N.E.2d 792; Kihm v. Lindley (1982), 70 Ohio St.2d 76, 24 O.O.3d 149, 434 N.E.2d 1354.

The BTA placed heavy reliance upon Spithogianis v. Limbach (1990), 53 Ohio…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weiss v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Spithogianis v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kihm v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hile v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. McGlothin v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeLassus v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. DeLassus v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API