Childs v. O'Donnell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Childs, Lee & Dunlapi plaintiffs, brought assumpsit for the price and value of several invoices of boots and shoes sold defendant, at the dates, and aggre-' gating the amounts, following:
January 25, 1888.......................... §142 39
January 31, 1888__________________________ 142 25
February 13,. 1888__________________________ 43 80
February 24, 1888.......................... 41 00
*535March 26, 1888.............................§105 25
April 2, 1888.............................. 9 00
April 11, 1888............................. 130 25
April 18, 1888..........l._................ 3 50
April 27,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ide v. BrodyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
- Hill and David v. Montgomery WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
- Acme Harvester Co. v. AxtellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Wyandotte Portland Cement Co. v. BrunerMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Powers v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.