Commissioner v. Fink
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Stevens
The value of certain and predictable rules of law is often underestimated. Particularly in the field of taxation, there is a strong interest in enabling taxpayers to predict the legal consequences of their proposed actions, and there is an even stronger general interest in ensuring that the responsibility for making changes in settled law rests squarely on the shoulders of Congress. In this case, these interests are of decisive importance for me.
The question of tax law presented by this case was definitively answered by the Board of Tax Appeals in 1941. See Miller v. Commissioner, 45 B. T. A.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.