Copling v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Presiding Judge:
The appellant, William Charles Copling, has appealed his conviction of Robbery With Firearms in the District Court, Comanche County, Case No. CRF-77-663. He contends that the evidence presented against him was insufficient to sustain a conviction, and that much of the evidence presented should have been excluded.
We will begin our discussion with the appellant’s second assignment of error, that certain evidence was erroneously admitted by the trial court. He divides this assignment into three parts, which we will treat separately.
First, the appellant argues that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Luker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Tharps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Contu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- State v. McLemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Roth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Swain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Greer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Dickson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.