John Eubanks v. Kim Wade
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurrence
WESTBROOKS, J.,
SPECIALLY CONCURRING:
¶ 22. I concur with the majority’s result that the judgment of the-circuit court should be reversed and remanded; however, I write separately, because in my opinion, the majority, fails to address Eu-banks’s ultimate issues on appeal.
I. Whether there was a hearing on Wade’s motion to dismiss.
¶23. The majority briefly mentions a hearing regarding the motion to dismiss; however, it does not conduct an analysis regarding whether such hearing actually occurred. It is important to address this issue on appeal, because during oral arguments before this Court,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Wholey v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Vinson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Jones v. Regency Toyota, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Sullivan v. TullosMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.