Legal Opinion · Concurrence

John Eubanks v. Kim Wade

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 16, 2017No. 2015-CA-00811-COAPublished

1Concurrence

WESTBROOKS, J.,

SPECIALLY CONCURRING:

¶ 22. I concur with the majority’s result that the judgment of the-circuit court should be reversed and remanded; however, I write separately, because in my opinion, the majority, fails to address Eu-banks’s ultimate issues on appeal.

I. Whether there was a hearing on Wade’s motion to dismiss.

¶23. The majority briefly mentions a hearing regarding the motion to dismiss; however, it does not conduct an analysis regarding whether such hearing actually occurred. It is important to address this issue on appeal, because during oral arguments before this Court,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wholey v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Vinson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Jones v. Regency Toyota, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sullivan v. TullosMississippi Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API