Legal Opinion

Sturgis v. Fay

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1861PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

At the October term, 1859, of the Allen Common Pleas, Fay commenced an action against Sturgis upon a promissory note. The writ in the cause was served by leaving a copy at the residence of Sturgis. There was judgment against him by default.

At the succeeding January term, Sturgis filed an affidavit showing that he was absent from the State when process was served, and was ignorant of the pendency of the suit till after judgment, and moved that the judgment be set aside. The affidavit' did not allege that affiant had any merits' in his application, nor show any excuse for not moving- to set…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woolley v. WoolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Robertson v. BergenIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Conwell v. AtwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Hood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Beard v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. McCormack v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Mabee v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API