Legal Opinion

Gordon v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 1933No. 4-3018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is urged that the court erred in directing the verdict against appellant, the beneficiary in the insurance policy sued on.

It is not contended, nor was any testimony introduced tending to show, that the money, the second premium, claimed to have been paid to R. H. Fiser, a former agent who solicited the insurance and collected the first premium, was ever paid to the insurance company or received by it. He was only a special agent with limited authority as shown for soliciting insurance and not a general agent within the meaning of that term.

The policy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United Friends of America v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Life Insurance v. HaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Dixie Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. HammSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Reserve Loan Life Insurance v. ComptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. The National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Union Life Insurance Company v. BolinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API