Legal Opinion

Oefinger v. Zimmerman

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-3013PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMMONS, District Judge.

I

This action was originally filed December 2, 1983, under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, by Plaintiffs Douglas Lawrence Oefinger, t/d/b/a DLO and David A. Goodman, t/d/b/a American Armament, against the Attorney General and his representatives and the District Attorney of Allegheny County, seeking injunctive relief. Frankford Arsenal was originally named as a party to this action, but on June 20, 1984, this Court granted the Motion of Frankford Arsenal for Voluntary Dismissal.

Plaintiff Douglas Lawrence Oefinger, t/d/b/a DLO [hereinafter…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coalition of New Jersey Sportsmen v. FlorioDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  2. Conkle v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Helmer v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. State v. RackisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Oefinger, Appeal OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API