Legal Opinion
Giustizia v. Radazo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 19, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
On July 9, 1994, the plaintiffs Raymond Giustizia and Robert Nethercott sustained personal injuries as a result of carbon monoxide poisoning while they were guests on board a fishing boat owned and operated by Louis A. Radazo. Along with Mary Giustizia,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bruno v. Price Enterprices., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Perkins v. Cosmopolitan Care Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003