Legal Opinion

People v. St. Onge

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1975No. Docket 20560PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of armed robbery, contrary to MCLA 750,529; MSA 28.797. He was sentenced to a prison term of from 40 to 60 years, and appeals by right.

Defendant first contends 1 that his conviction should be reversed because one of the prosecution > witnesses, David Woods, was compelled to testify in violation of his (Woods’) privilege against self-incrimination. The trial judge ordered Woods, who had pled guilty to a charge of acting as defendant’s accomplice in the robbery, to testify at trial. Woods attempted to claim his privilege on grounds that his guilty plea was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. People v. DenuylMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. HodoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. BradfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. CoatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. CrevistonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. PomaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. GallonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. LindsayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API