Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Eastern Airlines & GAB v. Griffin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 1995No. 93-292Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Judge

I concur with that portion of the court’s opinion which affirms the compensation order awarding attendant care benefits in an amount greater than that agreed upon by the parties. I dissent from that part of the opinion receding from certain statements in Fawaz v. Florida Polymers, 622 So.2d 492, 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), which impose a due diligence requirement on a party seeking relief from a stipulation on the ground of mistake of fact.

In approving the order on review, the majority relies upon Florida Rule of Workers’ Compensation Procedure 4.130, authorizing a judge of compensation claims…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Martin Company v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. John Crescent, Inc. v. SchwartzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Steele v. ADH Building Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
  4. Power v. Joseph G. Moretti, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Harris v. Spinali Auto Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API