Legal Opinion

Oxford v. McFarland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1851PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ERROR to the Vermillion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Assumpsit by McFarland, the defendant in error, against the administrator of Abel Oxford. The declaration contains counts for goods sold to, and work and labor performed for, the decedent, in his life time, and for work and labor performed for the administrator. A bill of particulars was filed with the declaration, stating the debt to be for nine months’ labor, at 13 dollars per *157month, six days’ labor making fence, at three dollars and fifty cents, and 400 bushels of corn, at the price of 64 dollars.

J. A. Wright, for the plaintiff. A. Kinney and J. P. Usher, for the defendant.

The defendant…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hays v. McConnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Brown v. YaryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Smith v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Adams v. Adams' AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API