Legal Opinion
Martin v. Geico Direct Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover no-fault benefits pursuant to a policy of automobile insurance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated July 14, 2005, which denied her motion, in effect, for summary judgment, and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The doctrine of collateral estoppel bars a party from “relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Robert v. O'MearaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Lobel v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Barnett v. IvesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Strychalski v. DaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Comprehensive Medical Care of New York, P.C. v. HausknechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Mew Equity, LLC v. Sutton Land Services, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Hibbert v. AvwontomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Saiti v. 316 E. 68th St. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.