Legal Opinion

Chapa v. Chapa

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1986No. Civ. 5165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a child custody case.

A psychiatrist, who had practiced his medical specialty for over four years, hospitalized the mother and conducted a sodium amytal interview with her. He testified as follows:

"Sodium amytal is a chemical substance, the vernacular of which some people call `truth serum,' and I'll put that in quotes. The purpose of using it is to induce a state of relaxation much like hypnosis, under which the subject, when questioned, is in effect, without the — what we call the preconscious censor — in other words, the inhibitions about things, such as telling the truth and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flurry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Flurry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Liberty National Life Insurance Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. McDuffie v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF TUSKALOOSASupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PittsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. State v. PittsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API