Legal Opinion
Chapa v. Chapa
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided May 21, 1986No. Civ. 5165PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is a child custody case.
A psychiatrist, who had practiced his medical specialty for over four years, hospitalized the mother and conducted a sodium amytal interview with her. He testified as follows:
"Sodium amytal is a chemical substance, the vernacular of which some people call `truth serum,' and I'll put that in quotes. The purpose of using it is to induce a state of relaxation much like hypnosis, under which the subject, when questioned, is in effect, without the — what we call the preconscious censor — in other words, the inhibitions about things, such as telling the truth and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Flurry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Flurry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Liberty National Life Insurance Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- McDuffie v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF TUSKALOOSASupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. PittsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- State v. PittsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989