Legal Opinion

Pedder v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 29979Published

Where a husband and wife domiciled in the State of California have a joint bank account and the husband has drawn funds from this account and purchased property in his own name, the income from such property is taxable to the husband.

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY PEDDER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Pedder v. Commissioner

Docket No. 29979.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

20 B.T.A. 11; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2221;

June 2, 1930, Promulgated

Where a husband and wife domiciled in the State of California have a joint bank account and the husband has drawn funds from this account and purchased property in his own name, the income from such property is taxable to the husband.

Stanley Pedder, Esq., pro se.

O. J. Tall, Esq., for the respondent.

MATTHEWS

In this proceeding the petitioner seeks a redetermination of his income-tax…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pedder v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API