Legal Opinion

Lugo v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1921No. Civ. No. 3772PublishedCited by 4 opinions

PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review a judgment on a Justice’s Court appeal. Annulled. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In an action of M. Lugo, Plaintiff, v. Geo. W. Hood et al., Defendants, in the justice’s court of Venice township, in the county of Los Angeles, a judgment by default was entered against the defendants on the second day of February, 1921. Thereafter, and within due time, the defendants gave notice of appeal on questions of both law and fact, which appeal was duly perfected. Thereafter the case came on for hearing before the superior court. This is a proceeding to review a judgment entered by the superior court as the result of that hearing. The judgment recites that the parties appeared…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Jones v. Cty. Court of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Maxson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sour v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. G. & H. Commercial Service v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Wood v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API