Legal Opinion

People v. Diaz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 2010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), the trial evidence was sufficient to allow a jury to infer both that defendant exercised dominion and control over the van from which police recovered over four ounces of crack cocaine, and that defendant had knowledge that the drugs were secreted in a hidden compartment beneath the van’s air bag cover (Penal Law § 220.18 [1]). Defendant’s knowledge could be inferred from his sole possession of the van at the time…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. ReismanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. AddisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. People v. GoldblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. GoldblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  5. People v. WallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API