Legal Opinion
City of Pasadena v. Richardson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 14, 1975No. Nos. 1155, 1175PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUNKS, Chief Justice.
This is a consolidated appeal of two causes of action involving identical parties and interrelated issues. Appellants, the City of Pasadena, Texas, the Pasadena Civil Service Commission and its Director, and the Pasadena Chief of Police, appeal from the judgment of the district court granting a writ of mandamus in favor of appellee, E. D. Richardson, and from the granting of his motion for summary judgment.
On June 12, 1972, appellee, E. D. Richardson, was indefinitely suspended from the Pasadena Police Department by then Chief of Police Ellis Means on the grounds of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fire Department v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Richardson v. City of PasadenaTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Bichsel v. CarverTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Richardson v. City of PasadenaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Todd v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Houston v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Dixon v. McMullenDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- City of Houston v. MeisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Steubing v. City of Killeen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- City of Houston v. Williams, Steve, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.