Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Hanna

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1981No. 11852PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*560OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, C. J.:

Appellants, Ronald and Mary Goldstein, sued respondent, Fuad Hanna, to compel specific performance of an option to purchase Hanna’s condominium. The district court entered judgment in favor of Hanna. We reverse and remand.

On or about December 10, 1977, the parties entered into a lease relating to Hanna’s condominium in Clark County, Nevada. The lease granted the Goldsteins an option to purchase the condominium, and declared “the option may be exercised at any time after December 1, 1977 and shall expire at midnight December 9, 1978 unless exercised prior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ellis v. NelsonNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Nevada National Bank v. Gold Star Meat CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Zunino v. ParamoreNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Alpark Distributing, Inc. v. PooleNevada Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Samuel Myers v. The Bennett Law Offices, and Doug McCallon Timothy Myers v. The Bennett Law OfficesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Cheqer, Inc. v. Painters & Decorators Joint Committee, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Orbit Stations, Inc. v. CurtisNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Blackman v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  5. Tore, Ltd. v. M.L. Rothschild Management Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API