Legal Opinion
Hidden Village, LLC v. City of Lakewood, Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2013No. 12-3543PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Hidden Village owns an apartment complex in the City of Lakewood. It sued the city and its officials, alleging they waged a racially motivated campaign of harassment aimed at driving out some of its black tenants. The district court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We conclude that most of Hidden Village’s claims may proceed to trial.
I
Lutheran Metropolitan Ministries runs the Youth Re-Entry Program, a service that helps young people released from foster care or juvenile detention re-enter society. The program prepares its clients to live on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Robert Shreve v. Franklin Cnty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Liana Revock v. Cowpet Bay West Condominium AsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Michael McDonald v. Marico FlakeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Karen Meyers v. Cincinnati Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.