In Re Mahaffay's Estate
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Appellants respectfully, but seriously, insist that this section 6975, Revised Codes of 1921, is in violation of section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States in that it denies to a certain class of persons within the state of Montana the equal protection of the law, as within the holdings in Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U.S. 377, 38 L.Ed. 458,14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 570 [see, also, Rose's U.S. Notes]; Gulf,Colorado Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150,41 L.Ed. 666, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255; Atchison, Topeka etc. R.R. Co. v.Matthews, 174 U.S. 96, 43 L.Ed. 909, 19 Sup. Ct.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reed v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Hauge's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Kentucky State Fair Board v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- In Re Marsh's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. MarshMontana Supreme Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.