Capital Area District Library v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
GLEICHER, EJ.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur with the majority’s determination that the Capital Area District Library is not a “local unit of *242government” as defined in MCL 123.1101(a) and that the library’s weapons policy is permitted by the District Library Establishment Act, MCL 397.171 et seq. Precisely because the library is not a local unit of government and has promulgated a policy falling squarely within its rulemaking authority, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the field-preemption doctrine nullifies the plain language of the relevant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.