Legal Opinion

Ragan v. Cox

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1946No. 4-7899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

The case of Ragan v. Cox came to us on appeal from the Court’s action in sustaining demurrers filed by the three defendants. We affirmed as to W. W. Beeson, clerk for Hot Spring County, but reversed with directions that W. A. Ragan and Ben H. Cox he required to answer the complaint. See Ragan v. Cox et al., 208 Ark. 809, 187 S. W. 2d 874.

The plaintiff is Maggie Ragan, who sues for her daughter, Louise, alleging actual damages of $15,000, and $35,000 punitive because of the wrongful act of Ragan in attaching himself to Louise as her alleged husband through…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kibler v. KiblerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Ragan v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Hood v. HoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Witherington v. WitheringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Sikes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Betnar v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Stilley v. StilleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Fryar v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Angvall v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API