Legal Opinion
Kleinman v. Merck & Co., Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 17, 2009No. L-3954-04/L-24-05PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
8 A.3d 851 (2009)
417 N.J. Super. 166
Elaine KLEINMAN and Ronald Martin, Plaintiffs,
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant.
No. L-3954-04/L-24-05
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Civil Part, Atlantic County.
Argued December 5, 2008.
Decided March 17, 2009.
Thomas M. Sobol argued the cause for plaintiffs Elaine Kleinman and Ronald Martin (Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Spector Roseman Kodroff & Willis, P.C., attorneys; Theodore M. Lieverman, on the brief).
John H. Beisner argued the cause for defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (O'Melveny & Myers LLP and Dechert LLP, attorneys; Diane P. Sullivan,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Cablevision Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- SHIRLEY POLANCO, ETC. VS. STAR CAREER ACADEMY (L-0415-13, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020